Sociology 106: Quantitative Sociological Methods
May 5, 2026
Weekly Assignment #11
In-class presentations
Final paper
Here is the schedule for final presentations. You’ll need to send me your presentation 2 hours before class so I can load them on my laptop.
| Order | Tuesday, April 28 | Tuesday, May 5 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zhexin Chen | Lawrence So |
| 2 | Mengxuan Wu | Doyoung Kwak |
| 3 | Arohi Behara | Azariah Smith |
| 4 | Megan Farrenkopf | Macheng Xiang |
| 5 | Jenny Liu | Violetta Wang |
| 6 | Bianca Chiu | Yihan Zhang |
| 7 | Srisha Raj | Rose Kong |
| 8 | Keyla Barcenas | Anthony Maldonado |
| 9 | Mahak Rathi | Claudia Gomez Bernal |
I’ll give you about 10-15 mins at the end of class for Course Evaluations
Big picture
This review is intentionally high-level. The goal is to help you organize your studying and recognize the kinds of reasoning the exam will ask for, not to preview exact questions.
What this means for studying
Focus on concepts, interpretation, and choosing the right tool for the job. You do not need to memorize long stretches of code.
Multiple choice
Choosing the right answer from 4 options.
R^2Short answer
Give you output or a scenario and ask you to intepret. No by-hand calculations. Hand-write interpretations.
| Goal | What the variables look like | Good choice |
|---|---|---|
| Show the distribution of one categorical variable | One categorical variable | Bar chart |
| Show the distribution of one continuous variable | One continuous variable | Histogram |
| Compare the mean of a continuous outcome across two groups | Continuous Y + binary group |
Two-sample t-test |
| Study the relationship between two categorical variables | Categorical X + categorical Y |
Chi-square test |
| Model a continuous outcome | Continuous Y |
OLS regression |
| Model a binary outcome | Y = 0/1 |
Logistic regression |
On the exam
Many mistakes come from choosing the wrong tool because the student did not first identify the outcome type.
P-value wording to know well
A p-value is the probability of getting results this extreme, or more extreme, if the null hypothesis were true.
For any output you read on the exam: identify the direction, comment on statistical significance, then interpret substantively in plain language.
| Term | Estimate |
|---|---|
| Intercept | 5.8*** |
| Divorced | -0.9** |
| Widowed | -0.6 |
| Never married | -1.2*** |
| Age | 0.02* |
R^2 |
0.16 |
Outcome: life satisfaction (1–7 scale). Married is the omitted baseline.
R^2 tells you how much of the variation in the outcome is explained by the model. In this case, 16%.Sample interpretation — Never married
Respondents who have never been married are predicted to score 1.2 points lower on life satisfaction than married respondents (the reference group), holding age constant.
| Term | Odds ratio |
|---|---|
| Income (thousands) | 1.02** |
| Age | 1.03*** |
| Married (1 = yes) | 1.38* |
Outcome: whether the respondent participates in a community organization (1 = yes).
(OR - 1) x 100
1.38 -> 1.38-1 ~ 38% higher odds0.76 -> 1-0.76~ -24% lower oddsSample interpretation — Age
Each additional year of age is associated with odds of participating in a community organization that are about 3% higher, holding income and marital status constant.
An interaction asks whether the relationship between X and Y depends on a third variable.
Sample interpretation
Group A’s education slope (1.2) is steeper than Group B’s (0.4) — group membership moderates the relationship between education and the outcome.
| How to Identify | What Moderation does |
|---|---|
| Big question | For whom or under what conditions does X affect Y? |
| Third variable | Changes the slope |
| Typical model | Interaction term |
| Visual idea | Non-parallel lines |
| Example | Education predicts income differently for men and women |
Quick test
If a third variable changes the slope of X -> Y across groups or levels, that is moderation. Look for non-parallel lines in a margins plot.
Sampling
Figure critique
R^2Best use of your time
Do not just reread code. Practice explaining what results mean.